Ms. Scarbary’s class

I write to find out what I’m talking about. – Edward Albee

Critical Theory in the Secondary Classroom

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 1:02 pm on Tuesday, September 5, 2006



“Rarely do high school teachers make their theoretical approaches explicit by naming them to their students.” – Deborah Appleman, Critical Encounters in High School English

As English teachers, we DO ask the questions of reader response theory: “What does the text mean to YOU?” “What do YOU think the writer is trying to say?” and we ask the questions that (hopefully) make our students think critically from a feminist standpoint: “How do the townspeople view Hester Prynne as opposed to Dimmesdale?” “Why are their standards different for women than men?” As educators, we want our kids to examine and utilize those multiple lenses. But we rarely, if ever, TELL them what we are doing, what they are doing. We don’t give our classrooms the vocabulary to go along with the practice. We don’t EXPLICITLY employ the language of Literary Theory. That is where we do disservice to their future learning. Inhabiting various critical perspectives can be and will be required of our students in other disciplines, and in many occupations, and we want our students to be able to articulate their comfort and familiarity with those skills. I accept Appleman’s challenge to incorporate “named” approaches for examining texts in my future classroom.

Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)

4 Comments »

2

   cindylouwho

September 12, 2006 @ 7:26 pm

Ms. Scarbary,

Your certainty about and acceptance of Deborah Appleman’s challenge is enviable. Personally, I love delving into literary theory—I feel it truly enriches and deepens the reading experience—and I think sharing theory with students by naming the process has the potential of engaging students who might otherwise be less than enthusiastic about literature, but I have a few worries about putting this into practice. First, I fear that a struggling reader may be overwhelmed by the introduction to theory. Would we even approach the subject with such a reader, or will be reserve access to this information to the upper echelon of students? (Of course, we will be adapting our lessons for our particular classes of students, but does this include those for whom reading a novel is a struggle?) Second, (and this feeling developed from prior work experiences in training others) how do we as English teachers prevent ourselves from divulging too much—so much that our students become completely bogged down in terminology and minutiae? The last thing I want to do when my goal is to provide new insight into literature and language is to squelch that interest and curiosity. Perhaps Appleman addresses some of these issues in her writing. Have you any ideas about how you’ll implement the teaching of literary theory?

Cynthia

3

   Kelly

September 20, 2006 @ 7:23 pm

test

61

   Candice

November 29, 2006 @ 9:40 pm

Once upon a time I felt the same. I still use the terms, but they are so far above my students’ heads sometimes that I feel hopelessly banished to basic English. I’m getting a little less intelligent everyday. I want to be able to have wonderful discussions about theory, and stir up a little controversy (did I spell that correctly. See, dumbing down.) I want my kids to discuss with me, not wait for me to tell them what to know (for those that listen; those that don’t talk amongst themselves.) So, obviously my class management is pretty bad, but darn it I want to teach the good stuff. Is it too late?

66

   Angela

December 5, 2006 @ 2:09 pm

Mandy,
I agree with you. I didn’t encounter the terms associated with literary theory until I was well into college. I think it would have helped me a great deal to know that I did indeed already have some experience with such analysis. As a teacher, I am also going to give my students a name for the kind of analysis they are doing.

Angela

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image