Ms. Scarbary’s class

I write to find out what I’m talking about. - Edward Albee

How I Learned to Write

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 1:01 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2007

I apparently began to write soon after I began to talk. My parents love to explain how I made up stories from toddlerhood, inventing long tales of my stuffed animals’ origins. I spun yarns over dinner, even before my parents could fully recognize all of my speech. Those elaborate ramblings were the start of my creative inventions. That thought was writing, even if it would be several more years until I could hold a pencil and record my words.

I became physically able to write at age five. With predictably atrocious spelling, I wrote plays for my Holly Hobbie dolls to perform. Can you tell I was an only child until I was 10? I needed the dialogue of my imagined siblings, and for that, I wrote. I crafted whole worlds of language, conversations both secret and public. Before I knew the terms dialect or diction or style, I generated the individual voices of my inanimate playmates. I invented the backstory and future for the present of all my toys.

At school, I practiced my letters with the fat pencils and writing tablets of all kindergarteners, with dashed half-lines to guide the curves of d’s and b’s. I gradually learned to draw out the words I could already read — “cat” and “mommy” and the ever important “Mandy,” with my technical ability forever lagging behind the paragraphs in my head. It would be years before I’d learn the distinction between the act of marking paper with pencil lines, and the act of composing. As a child, writing always seemed to be the chore of penmanship, never the creation of what to say with those words.

I’m not sure if anyone ever told me how to write. I know my memory is full of rules about things not to do and choices not to make — “never write essays in the first person,” “don’t ever begin a sentence with ‘but’ or ‘and’”, and “you have an over-reliance on the word ‘that’”– but knowing rules does not make art, does it? I suppose for that reason, I had considered myself a writer. I am a reader, certainly, and a collector of phrases and lover of words, but I can’t write. I can even see what it is I am aiming for: a simplistic, Nikki Giovanni style of writing that is so pure in its obviousness, without the pretentious metaphor or the kind of word choice you know came straight from a thesaurus. Yet I can’t create the proper vocabulary; the elegant expression eludes. I see it, the words I want to put on the page, and they don’t come out right. I inevitably start to quote someone else, because without effort my mind forms around the other sentences I’ve been accumulating for 32 years. Unfortunately for me, writing is not collage.

Well, I can functionally write. In those corporate years before I decided to teach, I was the best at creating technical requirements documents, and I could compose the clearest fax broadcasts to the agent base. Coworkers had me edit their emails if the CEO or VP level execs had to be cc’ed. Before that even, in high school I did well at the required standardized writing tests.  I was graded as above average at writing tasks. But somehow all that seems functional writing, the stuff of use when you need a letter of defense drafted to the Homeowners’ Association about your unpopular choice in paint color. None of that has any grace or art, and none of it is the stuff of beauty, and none of my words are things I’d collect and script into calligraphy to hang framed on the wall. I somehow separate the creative fiction from the writing of function, as though art is only inherent to things created for pleasure instead of for purpose.

And isn’t functional writing what I am supposed to teach my students to do? As an English Language Arts teacher, I am supposed to teach my kids to write the dry stuff of writing on demand essays, the 5 paragraphs that will ensure their high school graduation. The boring stuff, the stuff of SATs and the 11th grade Graduation Writing Test — that is what I am urged by administrators to teach. So considering MY personal struggle, my feeling that performing well on those tests is completely disconnected from being a true writer, how can I expect to instill a passion for writing in my students? If I continue to distance the writing of essays with the writing of novels and short stories, how will my kids ever believe that any of their writing has merit beyond a standardized test? Or that the writing they produce for those tests doesn’t have to be formal and static, without the grace or art of literature?

Sure, like all other angsty English majors who linger in coffee houses to write in their journals, I’ve penned the occasional poetry and short stories. Maybe one or two pieces I’ve even been proud of, and let others read. That was never written for an English class, though. I did not take creative writing, and I never had an English teacher who encouraged personal writing as a bridge to the essay. I suppose the Kirbys and Liner were before my secondary teachers’ time, and fluency in any form had not yet been touted as the answer to getting reluctant students to write. I learned the classic assembly of the topic sentence and supporting details, with appropriate transitions between paragraphs. Static and boring as it was, it was never a problem for me to produce the necessary number of words to adequately address the assigned topic, and I hated every functional word.

Even today, without any assignment, I can sit at my computer screen and compose lines upon lines of thought. I am a prolific blogger, a producer of many pages of personal journals. But I hadn’t considered that writing, or at least, not good writing. How can you expect your diary to be considered writing?? NOBODY CARES, is the chorus I’d expect from anyone I asked to read my writing. It’s too irrelevant; it doesn’t have resonance. And so I am back to feeling disconnected, not seeing how the words I put together, for whatever purpose, could be considered writing.

Perhaps I’m wrong for thinking writing (in italics) should be something greater than the random thoughts you have while picking up your dry cleaning. A greater perhaps might be that I am wrong altogether in thinking I am not a writer, or that I can’t teach students to write unless I teach them a strict essay form. Posting entries to a publicly accessible blog is writing. I somehow am a writer because I engage in the act of writing, however good or bad I consider the finished piece. Likewise, my students, with their journals on MySpace.com and Livejournal, are writers. The process, the journey, the creation is the thing, not the product. The more my students practice writing in any form, the more they learn their own voices and the more readily they can complete the dreaded essay. Every piece of writing increases vocabulary, increases understanding of usage and structures, and personal writing is certainly more palatable to 16-year-olds than grammar worksheets. I don’t have to write literature to teach writing, and my students don’t have to compose formulaic essays to learn writing.

Calls to Action

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 1:26 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2007

I seek to act politically in ways that strengthen the image and power of my profession. Leslie David Burns wrote this call to action: “English teachers… need to educate the public about English teaching and translate our knowledge and research so that the public can fully understand our complex work. In too many ways, professionals have quietly complied with accountability mandates that may not be good for English teachers or our students” (56). Professional communities not only create spaces for collaborartion, but also allow like-minded teachers the outlets to share research, establish policy, and discuss possibilities for action. English teachers who are upset by the narrow, political definitions of literacy or the limited views on success writing can together compile first hand classroom evidence of ”successful” instruction. I believe teachers are by their nature social advocates, and we should look to each other to form coalitions. Classroom teachers should make their individual students’ accomplishments and challenges part of the ongoing political debate about education. As Burns continues, “No one should be seen to know more about teaching and learning English than English teachers, and no one should be seen doing more to improve literacy education” (61).

 

 

 

 Works Cited

Burns, Leslie David. “A Practical Guide to Political Action: Grassroots and English Teaching.” English Journal March 2007: 56-61.

 

Update on my Student Teaching

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 6:11 am on Friday, January 26, 2007

I have now been student teaching for 3 weeks in an high school setting, and I love it. I am working in a northern suburb, just outside the perimeter of Atlanta. My student are Honors learners, TAG-identified. They are bright and verbal and, for the most part, really engaged in their learning. Most are, of course, extrinsically driven by parents and things, but I have been so amazed at the sophistication of thought on their part! They make pretty incredible text-to-world connections, and go there without much guidance or leading. This experience is fully validating why I want to be a teacher.

Additional Thoughts on Standardized Testing

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 4:49 pm on Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Jackie brings up a good point in the comments to my previous post about standardized testing. Standardized tests are unlikely to go away, for it IS true that some standard sort of yardstick is needed to accurately assess knowledge and ability. We all took the SAT to get into college, and took the GRE to be accepted to the graduate program. Frankly, an A at one school isn’t equal to an A elsewhere. Some schools are better than others, and we do need some form of accountability and some, however limited and questionable, quantitative measures of comparison.

But while those SATs and GREs were certainly “high stakes”, test scores alone do not determine whether or not a student will be accepted into college. College admission boards rightly look at grades, extra curricular activities, essays, and letters of recommendation when making these types of decisions. Unfortunately, our public schools no longer are. A single CRCT score can and will prevent a student from promotion to the next grade.  SATs and GREs can be retaken, and are weighted against other criteria, but these live or die tests are really a problem for me.

How is a digital text creating a different meaning than print text?

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 4:44 pm on Wednesday, November 8, 2006

 Translating print texts into digital format also alters the ways they transmit meaning and the ways in which they are accessed. -Janet Swenson, Carl A. Young, Ewa McGrail, Robert Rozema, and Phyllis Whitin 

This is a really interesting concept for me. As someone who has lived her life ONLINE for the past 11 years, gathering information from the internet is a transparent action for me. What I have never before considered, however, is how these digital texts alter my comprehension and my learning in different ways than the same text in a printed form. As the authors state, hyperlinking, imbedded image and video, and varying graphical arrangements have the ability to completely alter the way I read and make meaning. I am allowed to follow my own “personal, meaning-driven process,” jumping off the lead text midstream, into biographical information or suggested readings. How is reading an AP article online different from reading the same article in my morning newspaper? Reading the article about Rumsfeld stepping down as Secretary of Defense through the “Yahoo Top Story” rank in my email inbox, I have access to an imbedded slide show of his photos. I have direct hyperlinks to the Pentagon’s website and Sen. Carl Levin’s voting record. While this enriched text likely allows for more significant processing, I am fully aware that I am still at the mercy of what pieces of information the web designers and linking editors consider important pieces of information.
These acts call into question the importance of not only the author’s intent, but that of the web designer, graphic artist, web editor…. As ELA teachers, when using these newer internet sources, we must now consider not only the texts we are presenting, but the web contexts in which we situate those texts. This is potentially a whole new area of literary theory, for the meaning we make as readers exists not just in the transaction between the reader, text, and world, but includes the transactions between all the auxiliary texts linked to the prime text.

First reading- Alsup and Bush, Chapter 5

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 12:14 pm on Wednesday, October 4, 2006

Generally, we are opposed to the current growth in standardized testing and the belief that increased testing in synonymous with increased learning. (155) - Janet Alsup and Jonathan Bush, But Will it Work With REAL Students?

I agree with Alsup and Bush here. I believe the VAST majority of teachers in our public schools are against the amount of standardized tests we subject our students to. Moreover, the decreases in physical education, art and music, and technology electives in favor of test taking strategy classes have reached the level of the absurd. My personal biggest complaint about such tests, which Alsup and Bush don’t really address, is that these tests only look at system or state “cut scores” and passing and failing, as opposed to percentage of betterment. Aside from these multiple choice tests generally being inaccurate assessments and predictors of learning and knowledge, we don’t even look to them to chart growth from year-to-year. If kids have to take the CRCTs every year, why don’t we monitor “failing” children’s progress? And why should individual teachers be judged on the performance of a class he/she was handed? Isn’t that basically judging teaching ability by the students’ ability to rote memorize? In addition, as we have read in Unrau’s Content Area Reading and Writing, standardized tests are created and constantly revised to reflect an average. These “standardized” predictive tools by their very nature create a median, which means that there will always be 50% of our students “below average.” As overall scores improve, the average moves higher, so in order for an individual to show improvement, he or she must improve by a greater percentage than his/her peers. This type of labeling and competition, ocurring as early as Kindergarten, can be extremely harmful to children’s psyches.

….

My one criticism with the lead sentence is that the authors need to be more careful with their language- increased testing is synonymous with increased learning? Not exactly. Increased testing is synonymous with increased accountability, and performance on standardized tests is synonymous with learning. Both of those perceptions are wrong, of course, so the sentiment of the sentence is preserved, but I believe it could be better phrased.

Resources for Building Vocabulary and Concept Development

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 2:33 pm on Sunday, September 24, 2006

Unrelated to the readings for EDLA 7550, I wanted to post here the resources that Edward, Michelle C and I compiled for EDRD.

Internet Resources

http://content.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=4503

Articles and resources compiled by Scholastic magazine.

http://quizhub.com/quiz/quizhub.cfm

Collection of online games and quizzes.

http://www.webenglishteacher.com/vocab.html

Collection of a variety of quizzes and strategies.

http://vocabulary.com/

Mega-site for vocabulary building, features lots of activities.

http://www.varietygames.com/CW/

Create crossword puzzles online

http://www.vocabularya-z.com

Vocabulary list and lesson plan generator.

http://www.vocabulary.co.il/

Online word games.

http://games.yahoo.com/hub/goto;_ylt=AtyVIxpfQ.IhTakAoDPVLMgK230u?gn=gn_word#gamelist

Yahoo Word games front page.
Books
 

Blachowicz, Camille and Peter J. Fisher (2002). Teaching Vocabulary in All Classrooms. Merrill Prentice Hall.

Bromley, Karen (2002). Stretching Students’ Vocabulary. Scholastic Professional Books.

Burchers, Sam (1998). Vocabulary Cartoons II: Building an Educated Vocabulary With Sight And Sound Memory Aids. New Monic Books.

Burchers, Sam (1997). Vocabulary Cartoons: Building an Educated Vocabulary With Visual Mnemonics. New Monic Books.

Geer, Philip and Susan Geer (2004).  Picture These SAT Words!. Barron’s Educational Series.

Greenberg, Dan (2002). 25 Wacky & Wonderful Stories That Boost Vocabulary. Teaching Resources

Meltzer, Tom (1999). Illustrated Word Smart: A Visual Vocabulary Builder (Smart Guides). Princeton Review

Sternberg, Robert J. (1987), “Most Vocabulary is Learned from Context” in Margaret G. McKeown and Mary E. Curtis, in The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition, Lawrence Erlbaum .

Vurnakes, Caludia (1998). Words on the Vine: 36 Vocabulary Units on Root Words. Instructional Fair.
 

Flash Cards
 

Picture These SAT Words in a Flash Cards by Philip Geer

Extreme SAT Vocabulary Flashcards Flip-O-Matic (Flip-O-Matic) by Kaplan

 

Computer Games
 

Bookworm Deluxe!, United Developers

The Everyday Language of Shakespeare

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 12:23 pm on Wednesday, September 20, 2006

“If you say that something smells to heaven, or that you see something in your mind’s eye, or that something is a foregone conclusion, or that the course of true love never did run smooth, then you are speaking Shakespeare.” - Rex Gibson, Teaching Shakespeare

 

As a pre-service ELA teacher, I have had my fair share of Shakespeare study. To me, it is never boring, and never tedious. I love The Bard, forsooth. I even went to The Globe (recreation) in London in April, making a side trip by myself since my travel companions couldn’t have cared less. That being said, I admit my failing: is difficult for me to empathize with readers who find Shakespeare dense and unreadable. As much as I want to excite my students and generate a passion for Shakespeare within them, I struggle against the heart of me that wants to scream, “It’s beautiful! Just sit down and READ IT!”

Gibson’s book has made it easy to identify the common grounds between Shakespeare’s language and the modern adolescent reader. The irony, the puns, the perfect malapropisms- Gibson highlights all these aspects as lures to entice readers discovering Shakespeare. His words permeate today’s culture in ways we don’t fully acknowledge. By identifying and then stressing those key turns of phrase, we teachers can make Shakespeare accessible. We can use his language, without having to paraphrase and rewrite. We should offer our students examples of how Shakespeare’s works are loaded with familiar phrases. In doing so, we allow them to expand their vocabularies, and discover for themselves that Shakespeare is not as difficult as they may have thought.

Critical Theory in the Secondary Classroom

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 1:02 pm on Tuesday, September 5, 2006

“Rarely do high school teachers make their theoretical approaches explicit by naming them to their students.” - Deborah Appleman, Critical Encounters in High School English

As English teachers, we DO ask the questions of reader response theory: “What does the text mean to YOU?” “What do YOU think the writer is trying to say?” and we ask the questions that (hopefully) make our students think critically from a feminist standpoint: “How do the townspeople view Hester Prynne as opposed to Dimmesdale?” “Why are their standards different for women than men?” As educators, we want our kids to examine and utilize those multiple lenses. But we rarely, if ever, TELL them what we are doing, what they are doing. We don’t give our classrooms the vocabulary to go along with the practice. We don’t EXPLICITLY employ the language of Literary Theory. That is where we do disservice to their future learning. Inhabiting various critical perspectives can be and will be required of our students in other disciplines, and in many occupations, and we want our students to be able to articulate their comfort and familiarity with those skills. I accept Appleman’s challenge to incorporate “named” approaches for examining texts in my future classroom.

Introduction

Filed under: Uncategorized — msscarbary at 8:11 pm on Wednesday, August 30, 2006

I am currently enrolled in a Masters of Education program. This program allows students with an undergraduate degree in a content area (English) to receive their initial teacher certification in conjunction with a Masters degree. I expect to complete my certification and degree in August 2007.

After receiving my Bachelors degree, I worked in the auto insurance industry for 9 years, holding various positions in the field. The corporate environment was not for me, and decided to continue my education and become a secondary English Language Arts teacher. Ideally, I would like to teach 11th grade AP American Literature. American Lit is my true favorite, and I feel drawn to the AP environment because of the necessary emphasis on writing and crafting essays. However, my passion for teaching overrides all, and I would be happy in most any Language Arts classroom.

I spent the majority of the 2005-2006 school year working as a substitute teacher. I worked primarily at a middle school, but also some at the high school level. Being a product of public schools myself, I have always respected the dedicated individuals who work to constantly improve the quality of our children’s education and lives. I am proud to be on this path towards becoming an educator.

As a pre-service teacher, I am enrolled in Theory and Pedagogy of English Instruction this Fall semester. As a requirement for the course, I am to maintain this blog, posting responses to and discoveries from course readings and class discussion. I will also read my cohorts’ blogs, and comment to their posts. I view this exercise as an opportunity to practice what I intend to encourage in my students. I believe, as in echoed in most professional texts, their is no more effective model than the teacher. Since I expect my students to write, I must write. I will use this blog as an example of the processes I want my students to follow. Students will claim ownership of their writing when they see me do the same. I will publically display my writing to encourage my students to publish.